Topic, Contest: Classic or New Voting Type?

  Yeah, it makes us all feel more important. Sillius just has a complex. :P

  but i like voting (it makes me feel important XP)

  Well then we can add a rule to avoid that :)
If the community wishes to change something the judges already decided , then it is possible to do so... But only if "all" the voters (or at least the majority) wants it to be changed.

  you have a point there, Im... :/

  Let's say the 4 judges have different opinions than, let's say 95% of the voters. Would that be fair?

  jp isn't around BL enough to do that... I think. :/

  jp can choose the judges

  Judges can sign in to be judges, it's not always the 4 same judges on each contest :)

  I dont think the new system would be hard to understand for some players.

  I think the Classic way would work better. The Judge system will be too hard to understand for some players.

Also, if there are 4 Judges, WHO chooses them?

  The thing is to eliminate all bad entries so people will get less lazy to check all levels.(because there are less)

  In other words, is the role of the judges to determine the finalists of the contest ?

  I vote for judges for sure. Very nice idea Sillius.

  I get it. I won't be a judge, and I won't be able to vote as a normal member either, because I can't play: Moonlights, Blockoban 1, 2, Push, Rolling Turtle or Captain Dan vs. Zombie Plan. I like the judges idea, but not round 2 idea

  ou guys don't get it...
Judges pick the good levels that can then be voted by the normal members.

[In round number 2 people who completed all of the contest entries (that's right... You have to play all of them) can vote for the entry they think should win.]

  I choose classic, because I'd like to vote. I can't do that with the new system

  Too much like gundu's character thing... :/

  I think we should get 2 votes and 1 devote, (that subtracts 1 vote from an entry,

  I pick classic. Everyone has a different point of view, and letting only 4 people decide on which is better is kind of unfair

  Hmm....I will place my vote on Judges.

  Classic... Judges would ruin the entire thing because they're just qualified critics... critics, as we all know, are just cynical people. xP

EDIT: HOWEVER, the judging system could have potential... IDK what to choose. :/

  I think the news system is a lot better, people would finally play all the levels

  Hello, I got an idea bout a new system, and I ask you wich one you prefer.

Classic: Everyone can vote for a level entered in the contest and there are no requirements whatsoever.

Judges (New voting system): This is based on the idea that 4 (respected) members will sign up as judges. These judges will then judge all levels of the contest.
Every judge can chose whether or not they think the that the level is good or not.
If a level gets 3 (or more) judge votes it goes on to the next "round". In round number 2 people who completed all of the contest entries (that's right... You have to play all of them) can vote for the entry they think should win. (Judges can't vote for their own level, but they will still be able to participate since a level needs 3 judgevotes in order to pass on and that there are enough judges to make it possible)
The point is that people would get less lazy about the number of levels to play.
(you'd rather play 5 levels than 10)

Personally I'll vote for the new one (Judges)

Classic:

Judges: 3