Topic, Level "Time attack! 3"

You must register or log in to post a message.

chris3000 4 years ago

Ratman is right, there really should be less time but I guess it really dosen't matter.

Coolguy52 4 years ago

102k was a surprise to reach here... 103k seems impossible.

Coolguy52 5 years ago

That was a tricky highscore to beat :)

Pof 14 years ago

woooow dudes!!
try to beat this highscore!

the time really isn't attacking... It's possible in less than 10 seconds...

minimariner 14 years ago

There's too much time. You could lose about 80-90 seconds

Hyro 14 years ago

I got done with 84 seconds and I was going slow.... O-o

Jos 14 years ago

High score!

Bruno-heey 15 years ago

mmm, for me isnÂ´t funny.

Ratman 15 years ago

There should be less time hense the "time attack"

[1]