![]() |
|
|||||
Topic, The topic where you can only post the most random things you can think of that doesn't make sense... | ||||||
| ||||||
You must register or log in to post a message.![]() PS: Does anyone remember the big crash of September 2015? The message is too short! Please note that this forum is not a chat. Construct clear messages and make it easy for people to understand you. ![]() also, hi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nOUOn ![]() Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a scientist who studies puppers, doggos, yappers, and even woofers, I am telling you, specifically, in doggology, no one calls puppers doggos. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "doggo family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Doggodaemous, which includes things from sub woofers to birdos to sharkos (the glub glub kind not the bork bork kind). So your reasoning for calling a pupper a doggo is because random people "call the small yip yip ones doggos?" Let's get penguos and turkos in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A pupper is a pupper and a member of the doggo family. But that's not what you said. You said a pupper is a doggo, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the doggo family doggos, which means you'd call piggos, sluggos, and other species doggos, too. Which you said you don't. It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know? on a serious note, i'm on my way of restoring my old deleted comments here. So expect this topic to have the HOT picture on (no sexual meaning intended). A fun fact is that the time I deleted a large chunk of my comments in this topic, I realized that I was possibly the person I commented the most, but then again, chris3000 might've posted more. |